PARTON 10
Carbon 14 levels were
not significantly above background.
Sample results are at the 95%
confidence level.
NOTE: As a comparison, surface
waters usually have a nominal 1000 picocuries of tritium per liter. State
of Arizona drinking water regulations (see enclosed xerox) allow about
20,000 picocuries of tritium per liter.”
Eight months following this correspondence, on June 11, 1980, the Arizona
Game and Fish Dept. Director’s Office sent a letter to Ralph Ochoa of the
AAEC. (84) The correspondence follows here in its entirety:
“On July 30, 1979
I delivered ten samples of wildlife specimens to your lab for analysis.
Your report to me dated 10/10/79 indicated your findings from sample #1
and #7.
It was my understanding that
analysis of the remaining samples would be delayed pending completion of
your department’s investigations involving tritium contamination in Tucson.
As discussed with you by telephone,
we are particularly interested in analysis results of tag numbers 4, 5
and 6, the red-tailed hawks. As top carnivores, hawks have been shown to
concentrate pollutants in various organs and adipose tissue.
Please advise if you anticipate
further delays pertaining to samples 2-6 and 8-10”.(84)
The Office of the Director, Arizona Game and Fish Dept. issued another
request for test results on August 4, 1980. It reads as follows:
“I am enclosing a
copy of a letter from our wildlife manager at Oracle in reference to analysis
of wildlife samples. Collection of these samples required considerable
effort in addition to sacrifice of the protected wildlife. Please process
and return your findings as soon as possible.
Your assistance is appreciated.”(84)
The Office
of the Director, Arizona Game and Fish Dept. tried once again on October
30, 1980 as follows:
“I am enclosing a
copy of a letter from our wildlife manager at Oracle in reference to
|